FINANCIAL FACTORS INFLUENCING ADOPTION OF ISLAMIC BANKING BY CONVENTIONAL COMMERCIAL BANKS IN MOMBASA COUNTY

SAMEER MANAL, PATRICK EGONDI, SAMUEL MULI

Abstract


The study looked at the financial factors that make conventional commercial banks in Mombasa County more likely to adopt Islamic banking. The study's goals  to look at how loan availability, loan policy, loan cost, and loan payback time affect Kenyan commercial banks' use of Islamic banking. The study looked at commercial banks in the Mombasa CBD that offer Islamic financial services. Asset-Based View Theory, Transaction Cost Theory, and the Agency theory were used in the study. The study used descriptive survey research. The study used census method where by all of the 62 people who took part were used. The study employed closed-ended questions so that responses could be more easily categorized and interpreted. Kenya Methodist University's (KeMU) scholarly office gave the researcher permission to do the research and a letter of approval. The researcher also visited 31 traditional banks that offer Islamic banking services and asked for permission to do the research privately for a scholarly reason. The study found that increased loan accessibility and longer loan repayment periods positively influence adoption rates, suggesting that easier access to financial services and more flexible repayment terms encourage banks to adopt shariah-compliant practices. Conversely, stricter loan policies are found to have a negative impact on adoption, indicating that regulatory and policy frameworks play a crucial role in shaping banks' decisions. The study suggest underscores the importance of collaboration between conventional commercial banks and microfinance institutions to improve loan accessibility, leveraging MFIs' networks and experience with underserved populations. Additionally, the study suggests offering flexible repayment options to accommodate diverse financial circumstances, such as extended periods or customized schedules, making Islamic loans more attractive and accessible to a broader customer base.

Key Words: Islamic Banking, Loan Accessibility, Loan Policy, Loan Cost, Repayment Period

CITATION: Manal, S., Engondi, P., & Muli, S. (2024). Financial factors influencing adoption of Islamic banking by conventional commercial banks in Mombasa County. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 11 (3), 191 – 206. http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v11i3.3017


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alchian, A.A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and Economic organization Toward a new paradigm for understanding and studying organizations. International Journal of Education and Research, Vol. 1, No. 8, pp. 1-10.

Allen,J., and Gale, M. (2018). Acceptance of Islamic Banking in Muslim Customers. International Review of Management and Business Research, 1(20), 9–17.

Argyres, N.S. & Zenger, T. R. (2005). Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries. Organization Science, 23: 1643-1657.

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99.

Gelbard, M. E., Hussain, M. M., Maino, M. R., Mu, M. Y., & Yehoue, M. E. B. (2017). Islamic Finance in Sub-Saharan Africa: Status and Prospects: International Monetary Fund.

Gewal, N. (2019), A study on Islamic banking education and strategy for the new Millenium-Egypt experience. International Journal of Islamic financial Services, 2(4), 3-11.

Hakim, C. (2005). Secondary analysis in social research: A guide to data sources and method examples. London, UK: George Allen and Uwin.

Hidayat, S. E., & Al-Bawardi, N. K. (2016). Non-Muslims’ perceptions toward Islamic banking services in Saudi Arabia. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 9(6), 654-670.

Hove, P.; Sibanda, K. & Pooe, D. (2018). The impact of Islamic banking on entrepreneurial motivation, firm competitiveness and performance in South African small and medium enterprises. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(15), pp. 165- 174

Illias, N. (2019). The determinants of retail consumer choice of Islamic banking in Kenya, International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship. 1(2), 601-612.

Iqbal.Z, (2017), Islamic Financial Systems, Finance and Development, pp. 42 -45.

Islamic Development Bank, 2018). Micro-credit and emotional wellbeing: Experience of poor rural women from Sudan. World Development, 29, (11), 1957-1966.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, J. Finan. Econs., 3(4): 305-360.

Kasmani, M. R. (2013). Factors Influencing the Growth of Islamic Banks in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, United States International University-Africa).

Khattak, N., &Rehman, K. (2018).Customer Satisfaction and Awareness of Islamic Banking System in Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management 4(5), 56-74

Mugenda, O. A. (2003). Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.

Mugenda, O. A. (2018). Research methods: quantitative and qualitative approaches . Nairobi: Acts Press.

Mwangi, I. (2018). Determinants of access to credit by individuals in Kenya. The author indicates that the Kenya‟s National FinAccess Survey, 2017. European Journal of Business and Management. 3 (3), 218-231.

Rahman, T., & Ali, H. (2021). The impact of loan policies on risk management in Islamic banks. Islamic Banking and Finance Quarterly, 44(3), 176-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibfq.12345

Triki, T. and Faye,F. (2018). Finance and Income Inequality: What Do the Data Tell Us?, Southern Economic Journal. 7(2), 578-596.

Williamson E.O. (2018). Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory. HBS Conference on Organization Design.

Wilson, R. (2017), Islamic banking in the United Kingdom, in Khan, M.F. and Porzio, M. (Eds),Islamic Banking and Finance in the European Union: A Challenge, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 212-222.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v11i3.3017

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 3 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
  Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.